Paper detail

Improving impact monitoring through Line Of Variations densification

We propose a densification algorithm to improve the Line Of Variations (LOV) method for impact monitoring, which can fail when the information is too little, as it may happen in difficult cases. The LOV method uses a 1-dimensional sampling to explore the uncertainty region of an asteroid. The close approaches of the sample orbits are grouped by time and LOV index, to form the so-called returns, and each return is analysed to search for local minima of the distance from the Earth along the LOV. The strong non-linearity of the problem causes the occurrence of returns with so few points that a successful analysis can be prevented. Our densification algorithm tries to convert returns with length at most 3 in returns with 5 points, properly adding new points to the original return. Due to the complex evolution of the LOV, this operation is not necessarily achieved all at once: in this case the information about the LOV geometry derived from the first attempt is exploited for a further attempt. Finally, we present some examples showing that the application of our method can have remarkable consequences on impact monitoring results, in particular about the completeness of the virtual impactors search.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.