Paper detail

Improving estimates of msini by expanding RV datasets

We develop new techniques for estimating the fractional uncertainty (F) in the projected planetary mass (msini) resulting from Keplerian fits to radial-velocity (RV) datasets of known Jupiter-class exoplanets. The techniques include (1) estimating the distribution of msini using Monte Carlo projection, (2) detecting and mitigating chimeras, a source of systematic error, and (3) estimating the reduction in the uncertainty in msini if hypothetical observations were made in the future. We demonstrate the techniques on a representative set of RV exoplanets, known as the Gang of 27, which are candidates for detection and characterization by a future astrometric direct imaging (ADI) mission. We estimate the improvements (reductions) in F due to additional, hypothetical RV measurements (RVMs) obtained in the future. We encounter and address a source of systematic error, chimeras, which can appear when multiple types of Keplerian solutions are compatible with a single dataset. We find that for n = 10 new, hypothetical RVMs obtained in the last planetary year before 2025, with the same accuracy as the current available RVMs, F is reduced by ~18%. From there, each plus-one increase in 2 log n - log q , where q is the factor by which RVM measurement uncertainty is reduced, further reduces F by factor 0.18.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.