Paper detail

Improving Convergence Rate of Distributed Consensus Through Asymmetric Weights

We propose a weight design method to increase the convergence rate of distributed consensus. Prior work has focused on symmetric weight design due to computational tractability. We show that with proper choice of asymmetric weights, the convergence rate can be improved significantly over even the symmetric optimal design. In particular, we prove that the convergence rate in a lattice graph can be made independent of the size of the graph with asymmetric weights. We then use a Sturm-Liouville operator to approximate the graph Laplacian of more general graphs. A general weight design method is proposed based on this continuum approximation. Numerical computations show that the resulting convergence rate with asymmetric weight design is improved considerably over that with symmetric optimal weights and Metropolis-Hastings weights.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.