Paper detail

Improving Automated Patent Claim Parsing: Dataset, System, and Experiments

Off-the-shelf natural language processing software performs poorly when parsing patent claims owing to their use of irregular language relative to the corpora built from news articles and the web typically utilized to train this software. Stopping short of the extensive and expensive process of accumulating a large enough dataset to completely retrain parsers for patent claims, a method of adapting existing natural language processing software towards patent claims via forced part of speech tag correction is proposed. An Amazon Mechanical Turk collection campaign organized to generate a public corpus to train such an improved claim parsing system is discussed, identifying lessons learned during the campaign that can be of use in future NLP dataset collection campaigns with AMT. Experiments utilizing this corpus and other patent claim sets measure the parsing performance improvement garnered via the claim parsing system. Finally, the utility of the improved claim parsing system within other patent processing applications is demonstrated via experiments showing improved automated patent subject classification when the new claim parsing system is utilized to generate the features.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.