Paper detail

Improving Action Quality Assessment using Weighted Aggregation

Action quality assessment (AQA) aims at automatically judging human action based on a video of the said action and assigning a performance score to it. The majority of works in the existing literature on AQA divide RGB videos into short clips, transform these clips to higher-level representations using Convolutional 3D (C3D) networks, and aggregate them through averaging. These higher-level representations are used to perform AQA. We find that the current clip level feature aggregation technique of averaging is insufficient to capture the relative importance of clip level features. In this work, we propose a learning-based weighted-averaging technique. Using this technique, better performance can be obtained without sacrificing too much computational resources. We call this technique Weight-Decider(WD). We also experiment with ResNets for learning better representations for action quality assessment. We assess the effects of the depth and input clip size of the convolutional neural network on the quality of action score predictions. We achieve a new state-of-the-art Spearman's rank correlation of 0.9315 (an increase of 0.45%) on the MTL-AQA dataset using a 34 layer (2+1)D ResNet with the capability of processing 32 frame clips, with WD aggregation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.