Paper detail

Improvements in closest point search based on dual HKZ-bases

In this paper we review the technique to solve the CVP based on dual HKZ-bases by J. Bloemer. The technique is based on the transference theorems given by Banaszczyk which imply some necessary conditions on the coefficients of the closest vectors with respect to a basis whose dual is HKZ reduced. Recursively, starting with the last coefficient, intervals of length i can be derived for the i-th coefficient of any closest vector. This leads to n! candidates for closest vectors. In this paper we refine the necessary conditions derived from the transference theorems, giving an exponential reduction of the number of candidates. The improvement is due to the fact that the lengths of the intervals are not independent. In the original algorithm the candidates for a coefficient pair (a_i,a_{i+1}) correspond to the integer points in a rectangle of volume i(i+1). In our analysis we show that the candidates for (a_i,a_{i+1}) in fact lie in an ellipse with transverse and conjugate diameter i+1, respectively i. This reduces the overall number of points to be enumerated by an exponential factor of about 0.886^n. We further show how a choice of the coefficients (a_n,...,a_{i+1}) influences the interval from which a_i can be chosen. Numerical computations show that these considerations allow to bound the number of points to be enumerated by n^{0.75 n} for 10 <= n <= 2000. Under the assumption that the Gaussian heuristic for the length of the shortest nonzero vector in a lattice is tight, this number can even be bounded by 2^{-2n} n^{n/2}.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.