Paper detail

Improvement of algebraic attacks for solving superdetermined MinRank instances

The MinRank (MR) problem is a computational problem that arises in many cryptographic applications. In Verbel et al. (PQCrypto 2019), the authors introduced a new way to solve superdetermined instances of the MinRank problem, starting from the bilinear Kipnis-Shamir (KS) modeling. They use linear algebra on specific Macaulay matrices, considering only multiples of the initial equations by one block of variables, the so called ''kernel'' variables. Later, Bardet et al. (Asiacrypt 2020) introduced a new Support Minors modeling (SM), that consider the Pl{ü}cker coordinates associated to the kernel variables, i.e. the maximal minors of the Kernel matrix in the KS modeling. In this paper, we give a complete algebraic explanation of the link between the (KS) and (SM) modelings (for any instance). We then show that superdetermined MinRank instances can be seen as easy instances of the SM modeling. In particular, we show that performing computation at the smallest possible degree (the ''first degree fall'') and the smallest possible number of variables is not always the best strategy. We give complexity estimates of the attack for generic random instances.We apply those results to the DAGS cryptosystem, that was submitted to the first round of the NIST standardization process. We show that the algebraic attack from Barelli and Couvreur (Asiacrypt 2018), improved in Bardet et al. (CBC 2019), is a particular superdetermined MinRank instance.Here, the instances are not generic, but we show that it is possible to analyse the particular instances from DAGS and provide a way toselect the optimal parameters (number of shortened positions) to solve a particular instance.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.