Paper detail

Improved Weighted Additive Spanners

Graph spanners and emulators are sparse structures that approximately preserve distances of the original graph. While there has been an extensive amount of work on additive spanners, so far little attention was given to weighted graphs. Only very recently [ABSKS20] extended the classical +2 (respectively, +4) spanners for unweighted graphs of size $O(n^{3/2})$ (resp., $O(n^{7/5})$) to the weighted setting, where the additive error is $+2W$ (resp., $+4W$). This means that for every pair $u,v$, the additive stretch is at most $+2W_{u,v}$, where $W_{u,v}$ is the maximal edge weight on the shortest $u-v$ path. In addition, [ABSKS20] showed an algorithm yielding a $+8W_{max}$ spanner of size $O(n^{4/3})$, here $W_{max}$ is the maximum edge weight in the entire graph. In this work we improve the latter result by devising a simple deterministic algorithm for a $+(6+\varepsilon)W$ spanner for weighted graphs with size $O(n^{4/3})$ (for any constant $\varepsilon>0$), thus nearly matching the classical +6 spanner of size $O(n^{4/3})$ for unweighted graphs. Furthermore, we show a $+(2+\varepsilon)W$ subsetwise spanner of size $O(n\cdot\sqrt{|S|})$, improving the $+4W_{max}$ result of [ABSKS20] (that had the same size). We also show a simple randomized algorithm for a $+4W$ emulator of size $\tilde{O}(n^{4/3})$. In addition, we show that our technique is applicable for very sparse additive spanners, that have linear size. For weighted graphs, we use a variant of our simple deterministic algorithm that yields a linear size $+\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n}\cdot W)$ spanner, and we also obtain a tradeoff between size and stretch. Finally, generalizing the technique of [DHZ00] for unweighted graphs, we devise an efficient randomized algorithm producing a $+2W$ spanner for weighted graphs of size $\tilde{O}(n^{3/2})$ in $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ time.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.