Paper detail

Improved Statistical Determination of Absolute Neutrino Masses via Radiative Emission of Neutrino Pairs from Atoms

The atomic transition from an excited state $|{\rm e}\rangle$ to the ground state $|{\rm g}\rangle$ by emitting a neutrino pair and a photon, i.e., $|{\rm e}\rangle \to |{\rm g}\rangle + |γ\rangle + |ν^{}_i\rangle + |\barν^{}_j\rangle$ with $i, j = 1, 2, 3$, has been proposed by Yoshimura and his collaborators as an alternative way to determine the absolute scale $m^{}_0$ of neutrino masses. More recently, a statistical analysis of the fine structure of the photon spectrum from this atomic process has been performed [N. Song {\it et al.}, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 93}, 013020 (2016)] to quantitatively examine the experimental requirements for a realistic determination of absolute neutrino masses. In this paper, we show how to improve the statistical analysis and demonstrate that the previously required detection time can be reduced by one order of magnitude for the case of a $3σ$ determination of $m_0^{} \sim 0.01~\text{eV}$ with an accuracy better than $10\%$. Such an improvement is very encouraging for further investigations on measuring absolute neutrino masses through atomic processes.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.