Paper detail

Improved space-time tradeoffs for approximate full-text indexing with one edit error

In this paper we are interested in indexing texts for substring matching queries with one edit error. That is, given a text $T$ of $n$ characters over an alphabet of size $σ$, we are asked to build a data structure that answers the following query: find all the $occ$ substrings of the text that are at edit distance at most $1$ from a given string $q$ of length $m$. In this paper we show two new results for this problem. The first result, suitable for an unbounded alphabet, uses $O(n\log^εn)$ (where $ε$ is any constant such that $0<ε<1$) words of space and answers to queries in time $O(m+occ)$. This improves simultaneously in space and time over the result of Cole et al. The second result, suitable only for a constant alphabet, relies on compressed text indices and comes in two variants: the first variant uses $O(n\log^ε n)$ bits of space and answers to queries in time $O(m+occ)$, while the second variant uses $O(n\log\log n)$ bits of space and answers to queries in time $O((m+occ)\log\log n)$. This second result improves on the previously best results for constant alphabets achieved in Lam et al. (Algorithmica 2008) and Chan et al. (Algorithmica 2010).

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.