Paper detail

Improved probabilistic seismic demand-intensity relationship: heteroskedastic approachs

As an integral part of assessing the seismic performance of structures, the probabilistic seismic demand-intensity relationship has been widely studied. In this study, the phenomenon of heteroscedasticity in probabilistic seismic demand models was systematically investigated. A brief review of the definition, diagnosis, and conventional treatment of heteroscedasticity is presented herein, and based on that, two more generalized methods for both univariate and multivariate cases are proposed. For a typical four-span simply supported girder bridge, a series of nonlinear time history analyses were performed through multiple stripe analysis to determine its seismic demand-intensity that can be employed as a sample set. For both univariate and multivariate cases, probabilistic seismic demand models were developed based on the two aforementioned methods under the Bayesian regression framework, and the fitted results were compared and analyzed with the conventional models using linear regression approaches. In the presence of probabilistic seismic demand considering heteroscedasticity, the patterns of non-constant variance or covariance can be characterized effectively, and a better-calibrated prediction region than that of homoscedastic models can be provided. The causes of the heteroscedasticity phenomenon and subsequent solutions are thoroughly discussed. The analysis procedures can be further embedded in seismic fragility and risk assessment, thus providing a more accurate basis for aseismic decision-making.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.