Paper detail

Improved Optimal Testing Results from Global Hypercontractivity

The problem of testing low-degree polynomials has received significant attention over the years due to its importance in theoretical computer science, and in particular in complexity theory. The problem is specified by three parameters: field size $q$, degree $d$ and proximity parameter $δ$, and the goal is to design a tester making as few as possible queries to a given function, which is able to distinguish between the case the given function has degree at most $d$, and the case the given function is $δ$-far from any degree $d$ function. A tester is called optimal if it makes $O(q^d+1/δ)$ queries (which are known to be necessary). For the field of size $q$, the natural $t$-flat tester was shown to be optimal first by Bhattacharyya et al. for $q=2$, and later by Haramaty et al. for all prime powers $q$. The dependency on the field size, however, is a tower-type function. We improve the results above, showing that the dependency on the field size is polynomial. Our approach also applies in the more general setting of lifted affine invariant codes, and is based on studying the structure of the collection of erroneous subspaces. i.e. subspaces $A$ such that $f|_{A}$ has degree greater than $d$. Towards this end, we observe that these sets are poorly expanding in the affine version of the Grassmann graph and use that to establish structural results on them via global hypercontractivity. We then use this structure to perform local correction on $f$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.