Paper detail

Improved Non-Malleable Extractors, Non-Malleable Codes and Independent Source Extractors

In this paper we give improved constructions of several central objects in the literature of randomness extraction and tamper-resilient cryptography. Our main results are: (1) An explicit seeded non-malleable extractor with error $ε$ and seed length $d=O(\log n)+O(\log(1/ε)\log \log (1/ε))$, that supports min-entropy $k=Ω(d)$ and outputs $Ω(k)$ bits. Combined with the protocol in \cite{DW09}, this gives a two round privacy amplification protocol with optimal entropy loss in the presence of an active adversary, for all security parameters up to $Ω(k/\log k)$. (2) An explicit non-malleable two-source extractor for min-entropy $k \geq (1-γ)n$, some constant $γ>0$, that outputs $Ω(k)$ bits with error $2^{-Ω(n/\log n)}$. Combined with the connection in \cite{CG14b} this gives a non-malleable code in the two-split-state model with relative rate $Ω(1/\log n)$. This exponentially improves previous constructions, all of which only achieve rate $n^{-Ω(1)}$.\footnote{The work of Aggarwal et. al \cite{ADKO15} had a construction which "achieves" constant rate, but recently the author found an error in their proof.} (3)A two-source extractor for min-entropy $O(\log n \log \log n)$, which also implies a $K$-Ramsey graph on $N$ vertices with $K=(\log N)^{O(\log \log \log N)}$. We also obtain a seeded non-malleable $9$-source extractor with optimal seed length, which in turn gives a $10$-source extractor for min-entropy $O(\log n)$. Previously the best known extractor for such min-entropy requires $O(\log \log n)$ sources \cite{CohL16}. Independent of our work, Cohen \cite{Cohen16} obtained similar results to (1) and the two-source extractor, except the dependence on $ε$ is $\log(1/ε)(\log \log (1/ε))^{O(1)}$ and the two-source extractor requires min-entropy $\log n (\log \log n)^{O(1)}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.