Paper detail

Improved model-independent constraints on the recombination era and development of a direct projection method

The precision of recent experiments such as ${\it Planck}$ have allowed us to constrain standard and non-standard physics (e.g., due to dark matter annihilation or varying fundamental constants) during the recombination epoch. However, we can also probe this era of cosmic history using model-independent variations of the free electron fraction, $X_{\rm e}$, which in turn affects the temperature and polarization anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background. In this paper, we improve on the previous efforts to construct and constrain these generalised perturbations in the ionization history, deriving new optimized eigenmodes based on the full Planck 2015 likelihood data, introducing the new module 'FEARec++'. We develop a direct likelihood sampling method for attaining the numerical derivatives of the standard and non-standard parameters, and discuss complications arising from the stability of the likelihood code. We improve the amplitude constraints of the ${\it Planck}$ 2015 principal components constructed here, $μ_1=-0.09\pm0.12$, $μ_2=-0.17\pm0.20$ and $μ_3=-0.30\pm0.35$, finding no indication for departures from the standard recombination scenario. The third mode error is reduced by $60\%$. We utilise an efficient eigen-analyser that keeps the cross-correlations of the first three eigenmodes to $ξ_{μ,μ'}<0.1\%$ after marginalisation for all the considered data combinations. We also propose a new projection method for estimating constraints on the parameters of non-standard recombination. Using our eigenmodes, this allows us to recreate the ${\it Planck}$ constraint on the two-photon decay rate, $A_{\rm 2s1s}=7.60\pm0.64$, giving an estimate to within $\simeq 0.05σ$ of the full MCMC result. The improvements on the analysis using the ${\it Planck}$ data will allow us to implement this new method for analysis with fundamental constant variations in the future.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.