Paper detail

Improved lower bounds for the maximum size of Condorcet domains

Condorcet domains are sets of linear orders with the property that, whenever voters' preferences are restricted to the domain, the pairwise majority relation (for an odd number of voters) is transitive and hence a linear order. Determining the maximum size of a Condorcet domain, sometimes under additional constraints, has been a longstanding problem in the mathematical theory of majority voting. The exact maximum is only known for $n\leq 8$ alternatives. In this paper we use a structural analysis of the largest domains for small $n$ to design a new inductive search method. Using an implementation of this method on a supercomputer, together with existing algorithms, we improve the size of the largest known domains for all $9 \leq n \leq 20$. These domains are then used in a separate construction to obtain the currently largest known domains for $21 \leq n \leq 25$, and to improve the best asymptotic lower bound for the maximum size of a Condorcet domain to $Ω(2.198139^n)$. Finally, we discuss properties of the domains found and state several open problems and conjectures.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.