Paper detail

Improved limits for violations of local position invariance from atomic clock comparisons

We compare two optical clocks based on the $^2$S$_{1/2}(F=0)\to {}^2$D$_{3/2}(F=2)$ electric quadrupole (E2) and the $^2$S$_{1/2}(F=0)\to {}^2$F$_{7/2}(F=3)$ electric octupole (E3) transition of $^{171}$Yb$^{+}$ and measure the frequency ratio $ν_{\mathrm{E3}}/ν_{\mathrm{E2}}=0.932\,829\,404\,530\,965\,376(32)$. We determine the transition frequency $ν_{E3}=642\,121\,496\,772\,645.10(8)$ Hz using two caesium fountain clocks. Repeated measurements of both quantities over several years are analyzed for potential violations of local position invariance. We improve by factors of about 20 and 2 the limits for fractional temporal variations of the fine structure constant $α$ to $1.0(1.1)\times10^{-18}/\mathrm{yr}$ and of the proton-to-electron mass ratio $μ$ to $-8(36)\times10^{-18}/\mathrm{yr}$. Using the annual variation of the Sun's gravitational potential at Earth $Φ$, we improve limits for a potential coupling of both constants to gravity, $(c^2/α) (dα/dΦ)=14(11)\times 10^{-9}$ and $(c^2/μ) (dμ/dΦ)=7(45)\times 10^{-8}$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.