Paper detail

Improved Kernels for Tracking Path Problem

Tracking of moving objects is crucial to security systems and networks. Given a graph $G$, terminal vertices $s$ and $t$, and an integer $k$, the \textsc{Tracking Paths} problem asks whether there exists at most $k$ vertices, which if marked as trackers, would ensure that the sequence of trackers encountered in each s-t path is unique. It is known that the problem is NP-hard and admits a kernel (reducible to an equivalent instance) with $\mathcal{O}(k^6)$ vertices and $\mathcal{O}(k^7)$ edges, when parameterized by the size of the output (tracking set) $k$ [5]. An interesting question that remains open is whether the existing kernel can be improved. In this paper we answer this affirmatively: (i) For general graphs, we show the existence of a kernel of size $\mathcal{O}(k^2)$, (ii) For planar graphs, we improve this further by giving a kernel of size $\mathcal{O}(k)$. In addition, we also show that finding a tracking set of size at most $n-k$ for a graph on $n$ vertices is hard for the parameterized complexity class W[1], when parameterized by $k$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.