Paper detail

Improved hardness results for unique shortest vector problem

We give several improvements on the known hardness of the unique shortest vector problem. - We give a deterministic reduction from the shortest vector problem to the unique shortest vector problem. As a byproduct, we get deterministic NP-hardness for unique shortest vector problem in the $\ell_\infty$ norm. - We give a randomized reduction from SAT to uSVP_{1+1/poly(n)}. This shows that uSVP_{1+1/poly(n)} is NP-hard under randomized reductions. - We show that if GapSVP_γ\in coNP (or coAM) then uSVP_{\sqrtγ} \in coNP (coAM respectively). This simplifies previously known uSVP_{n^{1/4}} \in coAM proof by Cai \cite{Cai98} to uSVP_{(n/\log n)^{1/4}} \in coAM, and additionally generalizes it to uSVP_{n^{1/4}} \in coNP. - We give a deterministic reduction from search-uSVP_γto the decision-uSVP_{γ/2}. We also show that the decision-uSVP is {\bf NP}-hard for randomized reductions, which does not follow from Kumar-Sivakumar \cite{KS01}.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.