Paper detail

Improved Gilbert-Varshamov bounds for hopping cyclic codes and optical orthogonal codes

Hopping cyclic codes (HCCs) are (non-linear) cyclic codes with the additional property that the $n$ cyclic shifts of every given codeword are all distinct, where $n$ is the code length. Constant weight binary hopping cyclic codes are also known as optical orthogonal codes (OOCs). HCCs and OOCs have various practical applications and have been studied extensively over the years. The main concern of this paper is to present improved Gilbert-Varshamov type lower bounds for these codes, when the minimum distance is bounded below by a linear factor of the code length. For HCCs, we improve the previously best known lower bound of Niu, Xing, and Yuan by a linear factor of the code length. For OOCs, we improve the previously best known lower bound of Chung, Salehi, and Wei, and Yang and Fuja by a quadratic factor of the code length. As by-products, we also provide improved lower bounds for frequency hopping sequences sets and error-correcting weakly mutually uncorrelated codes. Our proofs are based on tools from probability theory and graph theory, in particular the McDiarmid's inequality on the concentration of Lipschitz functions and the independence number of locally sparse graphs.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.