Paper detail

Improved Gibbs samplers for Cosmic Microwave Background power spectrum estimation

We study different variants of the Gibbs sampler algorithm from the perspective of their applicability to the estimation of power spectra of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. These include approaches studied earlier in the CMB literature as well as new ones which are proposed in this work. We demonstrate all these variants on full and cut sky simulations and compare their performance, assessing both their computational and statistical efficiency. For this we employ a consistent comparison metric, an effective sample size (ESS) per second, commonly used in this context in the statistical literature. We show that one of the proposed approaches, referred to as Centered overrelax, which capitalizes on additional, auxiliary variables to minimize computational time needed per sample, and uses overrelaxation to decorrelate subsequent samples, performs better than the standard Gibbs sampler by a factor between one and two orders of magnitude in the nearly full-sky, satellite-like cases. It therefore potentially provides an interesting alternative to the currently favored approaches.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.