Paper detail

Improved estimator of the entropy and goodness of fit tests in ranked set sampling

The entropy is one of the most applicable uncertainty measures in many statistical and en- gineering problems. In statistical literature, the entropy is used in calculation of the Kullback- Leibler (KL) information which is a powerful mean for performing goodness of fit tests. Ranked Set Sampling (RSS) seems to provide improved estimators of many parameters of the popu- lation in the huge studied problems in the literature. It is developed for situations where the variable of interest is difficult or expensive to measure, but where ranking in small sub-samples is easy. In This paper, we introduced two estimators for the entropy and compare them with each other and the estimator of the entropy in Simple Random Sampling (SRS) in the sense of bias and Root of Mean Square Errors (RMSE). It is observed that the RSS scheme would improve this estimator. The best estimator of the entropy is used along with the estimator of the mean and two biased and unbiased estimators of variance based on RSS scheme, to esti- mate the KL information and perform goodness of fit tests for exponentiality and normality. The desired critical values and powers are calculated. It is also observed that RSS estimators would increase powers.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.