Paper detail

Improved envelope and emittance description of particle beams using the Fokker-Planck approach

Beam dynamics calculations that are based on the Vlasov equation do not permit the the treatment of stochastic phenomena such as intra-beam scattering. If the nature of the stochastic process can be regarded as a Markov process, we are allowed to use the Fokker-Planck equation to describe the change of the phase space volume the beam occupies. From the Fokker-Planck equation we derive equations of motion for the beam envelopes and for the rms-emittances. Compared to previous approaches based on Liouville's theorem, these equations contain additional terms that describe the temperature balancing within the beam. Our formalism is applied to the effect of intra-beam scattering relevant for beams circulating in storage rings near thermodynamical equilibrium. In this case, the Fokker-Planck coefficients can be treated as adiabatic constants of motion. Due to the simplified analysis based on `beam moments', we obtain fairly simple equations that allow us to estimate the growth rate of the beam emittance.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.