Paper detail

Improved empirical parametrizations of the $γ^\ast N \to N(1535)$ transition amplitudes and the Siegert's theorem

Some empirical parametrizations of the $γ^\ast N \to N(1535)$ transition amplitudes violates the Siegert's theorem, that relates the longitudinal and the transverse amplitudes, in the pseudo-threshold limit (nucleon and resonance at rest). In the case of the electromagnetic transition from the nucleon (mass $M$) to the resonance $N(1525)$ (mass $M_R$), the Siegert's theorem is sometimes expressed by the relation $|{\bf q}| A_{1/2}= λS_{1/2}$ in the pseudo-threshold limit, when the photon momentum $|{\bf q}|$ vanishes, and $λ= \sqrt{2} (M_R -M)$. In this article, we argue that the Siegert's theorem should be expressed by the relation $A_{1/2} = λ\frac{S_{1/2}}{ |{\bf q}|}$, in the limit $|{\bf q}| \to 0$. This result is a consequence of the relation $S_{1/2} \propto |{\bf q}|$, when $|{\bf q}| \to 0$, as suggested by the analysis of the transition form factors and by the orthogonality between the nucleon and $N(1535)$ states. We propose then new empirical parametrizations for the $γ^\ast N \to N(1535)$ helicity amplitudes, that are consistent with the data and the Siegert's theorem. The proposed parametrization follow closely the MAID2007 parametrization, except for a small deviation in the amplitudes $A_{1/2}$ and $S_{1/2}$ when $Q^2 < 1.5$ GeV$^2$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.