Paper detail

Improved decay for quasilinear wave equations close to asymptotically flat spacetimes including black hole spacetimes

We study the quasilinear wave equation $\Box_{g}ϕ=0$ where the metric $g = g(ϕ,t,x)$ is close to and asymptotically approaches $g(0,t,x)$, which equals the Schwarzschild metric or a Kerr metric with small angular momentum, as time tends to infinity. Under only weak assumptions on the metric coefficients, we prove an improved pointwise decay rate for the solution $ϕ$. One consequence of this rate is that for bounded $|x|$, we have the integrable decay rate $|ϕ(t,x)| \le Ct^{-1-\min(δ,1)}$ where $δ>0$ is a parameter governing the decay, near the light cone, of the coefficient of the slowest-decaying term in the quasilinearity. We also obtain the same aforementioned pointwise decay rates for the quasilinear wave equation $(\Box_{\tilde g} + B^α(t,x)\partial_α+ V(t,x))ϕ=0$ with a more general asymptotically flat metric $\tilde g = \tilde g(ϕ,t,x)$ and with other time-dependent asymptotically flat lower order terms.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.