Paper detail

Improved Criterion for Sawtooth Trigger and Modelling

We discuss the role of neoclassical resistivity and local magnetic shear in the triggering of the sawtooth in tokamaks. When collisional detrapping of electrons is considered the value of the safety factor on axis, $q(0,t)$, evolves on a new time scale, $τ_{*}=τ_ην_{*}/(8\sqrtε)$, where $τ_η=4πa^{2}/[c^{2}η(0)]$ is the resistive diffusion time, $ν_{*}=ν_{e}/(ε^{3/2}ω_{te})$ the electron collision frequency normalised to the transit frequency and $ε=a/R_{0}$ the tokamak inverse aspect ratio. Such evolution is characterised by the formation of a structure of size $δ_{*}\simν_{*}^{2/3}a$ around the magnetic axis, which can drive rapid evolution of the magnetic shear and decrease of $q(0,t)$. We investigate two possible trigger mechanisms for a sawtooth collapse corresponding to crossing the linear threshold for the $m=1,n=1$ instability and non-linear triggering of this mode by a core resonant mode near the magnetic axis. The sawtooth period in each case is determined by the time for the resistive evolution of the $q$-profile to reach the relevant stability threshold; in the latter case it can be strongly affected by $ν_*.$

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.