Paper detail

Improved Competitive Analysis of Online Scheduling Deadline-Sensitive Jobs

We consider the following scheduling problem. There is a single machine and the jobs will arrive for completion online. Each job j is preemptive and, upon its arrival, its other characteristics are immediately revealed to the machine: the deadline requirement, the workload and the value. The objective is to maximize the aggregate value of jobs completed by their deadlines. Using the minimum of the ratios of deadline minus arrival time to workload over all jobs as the slackness s, a non-committed and a committed online scheduling algorithm is proposed in [Lucier et al., SPAA'13; Azar et al., EC'15], achieving competitive ratios of 2+f(s), where the big O notation f(s)=\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{(\sqrt[3]{s}-1)^{2}}), and (2+f(s*b))/b respectively, where b=ω*(1-ω), ωis in (0, 1), and s is no less than 1/b. In this paper, without recourse to the dual fitting technique used in the above works, we propose a simpler and more intuitive analytical framework for the two algorithms, improving the competitive ratio of the first algorithm by 1 and therefore improving the competitive ratio of the second algorithm by 1/b. As stated in [Lucier et al., SPAA'13; Azar et al. EC'15], it is justifiable in scenarios like the online batch processing for cloud computing that the slackness s is large, hence the big O notation in the above competitive ratios can be ignored. Under the assumption, our analysis brings very significant improvements to the competitive ratios of the two algorithms: from 2 to 1 and from 2/b to 1/b respectively.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.