Paper detail

Improved Combinatorial Approximation Algorithms for MAX CUT in Sparse Graphs

The Max-Cut problem is a fundamental NP-hard problem, which is attracting attention in the field of quantum computation these days. Regarding the approximation algorithm of the Max-Cut problem, algorithms based on semidefinite programming have achieved much better approximation ratios than combinatorial algorithms. Therefore, filling the gap is an interesting topic as combinatorial algorithms also have some merits. In sparse graphs, there is a linear-time combinatorial algorithm with the approximation ratio $\frac{1}{2}+\frac{n-1}{4m}$ [Ngoc and Tuza, Comb. Probab. Comput. 1993], which is known as the Edwards-Erdős bound. In subcubic graphs, the combinatorial algorithm by Bazgan and Tuza [Discrete Math. 2008] has the best approximation ratio $\frac{5}{6}$ that runs in $O(n^2)$ time. Based on the approach by Bazgan and Tuza, we introduce a new vertex decomposition of graphs, which we call tree-bipartite decomposition. With the decomposition, we present a linear-time $(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{n-1}{2m})$-approximation algorithm for the Max-Cut problem. As a derivative, we also present a linear-time $\frac{5}{6}$-approximation algorithm in subcubic graphs, which solves an open problem in their paper.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.