Paper detail

Improved Capacity Approximations for Gaussian Relay Networks

Consider a Gaussian relay network where a number of sources communicate to a destination with the help of several layers of relays. Recent work has shown that a compress-and-forward based strategy at the relays can achieve the capacity of this network within an additive gap. In this strategy, the relays quantize their observations at the noise level and map it to a random Gaussian codebook. The resultant capacity gap is independent of the SNR's of the channels in the network but linear in the total number of nodes. In this paper, we show that if the relays quantize their signals at a resolution decreasing with the number of nodes in the network, the additive gap to capacity can be made logarithmic in the number of nodes for a class of layered, time-varying wireless relay networks. This suggests that the rule-of-thumb to quantize the received signals at the noise level used for compress-and-forward in the current literature can be highly suboptimal.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.