Paper detail

Improved bounds on the Hadwiger-Debrunner numbers

Let $HD_d(p,q)$ denote the minimal size of a transversal that can always be guaranteed for a family of compact convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ which satisfy the $(p,q)$-property ($p \geq q \geq d+1$). In a celebrated proof of the Hadwiger-Debrunner conjecture, Alon and Kleitman proved that $HD_d(p,q)$ exists for all $p \geq q \geq d+1$. Specifically, they prove that $HD_d(p,d+1)$ is $\tilde{O}(p^{d^2+d})$. We present several improved bounds: (i) For any $q \geq d+1$, $HD_d(p,q) = \tilde{O}(p^{d \left(\frac{q-1}{q-d}\right)})$. (ii) For $q \geq \log p$, $HD_d(p,q) = \tilde{O}(p+(p/q)^d)$. (iii) For every $ε> 0$ there exists a $p_0 = p_0(ε)$ such that for every $p \geq p_0$ and for every $q \geq p^{\frac{d-1}{d}+ε}$ we have: $p-q+1 \leq HD_d(p,q) \leq p-q+2$. The latter is the first near tight estimate of $HD_d(p,q)$ for an extended range of values of $(p,q)$ since the 1957 Hadwiger-Debrunner theorem. We also prove a $(p,2)$-theorem for families in $\mathbb{R}^2$ with union complexity below a specific quadratic bound. Based on this, we introduce a polynomial time constant factor approximation algorithm for MAX-CLIQUE of intersection graphs of convex sets satisfying this property.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.