Paper detail

Improved bounds on the chromatic numbers of the square of Kneser graphs

The Kneser graph $K(n,k)$ is the graph whose vertices are the $k$-elements subsets of an $n$-element set, with two vertices adjacent if the sets are disjoint. The square $G^2$ of a graph $G$ is the graph defined on $V(G)$ such that two vertices $u$ and $v$ are adjacent in $G^2$ if the distance between $u$ and $v$ in $G$ is at most 2. Determining the chromatic number of the square of the Kneser graph $K(2k+1, k)$ is an interesting problem, but not much progress has been made. Kim and Nakprasit \cite{2004KN} showed that $χ(K^2(2k+1,k)) \leq 4k+2$, and Chen, Lih, and Wu \cite{2009CLW} showed that $χ(K^2(2k+1,k)) \leq 3k+2$ for $k \geq 3$. In this paper, we give improved upper bounds on $χ(K^2(2k+1,k))$. We show that $χ(K^2(2k+1,k)) \leq 2k+2$, if $ 2k +1 = 2^n -1$ for some positive integer $n$. Also we show that $χ(K^2(2k+1,k)) \leq \frac{8}{3}k+\frac{20}{3}$ for every integer $k\ge 2$. In addition to giving improved upper bounds, our proof is concise and can be easily understood by readers while the proof in \cite{2009CLW} is very complicated. Moreover, we show that $χ(K^2(2k+r,k))=Θ(k^r)$ for each integer $2 \leq r \leq k-2$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.