Paper detail

Improved bounds on coloring of graphs

Given a graph $G$ with maximum degree $Δ\ge 3$, we prove that the acyclic edge chromatic number $a'(G)$ of $G$ is such that $a'(G)\le\lceil 9.62 (Δ-1)\rceil$. Moreover we prove that: $a'(G)\le \lceil 6.42(Δ-1)\rceil$ if $G$ has girth $g\ge 5\,$; $a'(G)\le \lceil5.77 (Δ-1)\rc$ if $G$ has girth $g\ge 7$; $a'(G)\le \lc4.52(\D-1)\rc$ if $g\ge 53$; $a'(G)\le \D+2\,$ if $g\ge \lceil25.84\D\log\D(1+ 4.1/\log\D)\rceil$. We further prove that the acyclic (vertex) chromatic number $a(G)$ of $G$ is such that $a(G)\le \lc 6.59 Δ^{4/3}+3.3\D\rc$. We also prove that the star-chromatic number $χ_s(G)$ of $G$ is such that $χ_s(G)\le \lc4.34Δ^{3/2}+ 1.5\D\rc$. We finally prove that the $\b$-frugal chromatic number $χ^\b(G)$ of $G$ is such that $χ^\b(G)\le \lc\max\{k_1(\b)\D,\; k_2(\b){\D^{1+1/\b}/ (\b!)^{1/\b}}\}\rc$, where $k_1(\b)$ and $k_2(\b)$ are decreasing functions of $\b$ such that $k_1(\b)\in[4, 6]$ and $k_2(\b)\in[2,5]$. To obtain these results we use an improved version of the Lovász Local Lemma due to Bissacot, Fernández, Procacci and Scoppola \cite{BFPS}.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.