Paper detail

Improved bounds for the expected number of $k$-sets

Given a finite set of points $S\subset\mathbb{R}^d$, a $k$-set of $S$ is a subset $A \subset S$ of size $k$ which can be strictly separated from $S \setminus A $ by a hyperplane. Similarly, a $k$-facet of a point set $S$ in general position is a subset $Δ\subset S$ of size $d$ such that the hyperplane spanned by $Δ$ has $k$ points from $S$ on one side. For a probability distribution $P$ on $\mathbb{R}^d$, we study $E_P(k,n)$, the expected number of $k$-facets of a sample of $n$ random points from $P$. When $P$ is a distribution on $\mathbb{R}^2$ such that the measure of every line is 0, we show that $E_P(k,n) = O(n(k+1)^{1/4})$. Our argument is based on a technique by Bárány and Steiger. We study how it may be possible to improve this bound using the continuous version of the polynomial partitioning theorem. This motivates a question concerning the points of intersection of an algebraic curve and the $k$-edge graph of a set of points. We also study a variation on the $k$-set problem for the set system whose set of ranges consists of all translations of some strictly convex body in the plane. The motivation is to show that the technique by Bárány and Steiger is tight for a natural family of set systems. For any such set system, we determine bounds for the expected number of $k$-sets which are tight up to logarithmic factors.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.