Paper detail

Improved $b$-jet Energy Correction for $H \to b\bar{b}$ Searches at CDF

We present a method for improving the $b$-jet energy resolution in order to improve the signal sensitivity in searches for particles decaying to a $b$ quark and anti-$b$ quark. A correction function is computed for individual jets, which combines information from the secondary vertex tagger, the offline tracking and standard calorimeter-based jet-energy reconstruction algorithm in order to provide a more accurate measurement of the true $b$-quark energy. We apply the correction to Monte-Carlo-simulated jets in the process $WH \rightarrow \ell νb\bar b$ and find an improvement in both the mean and the resolution of the $b$-jet energy with respect to the $b$-quark energy. The correction improves the measured Higgs dijet invariant mass resolution from $\sim$ 15%(standard jet corrections) to $\sim$ 11%(improved jet corrections) in the Higgs mass range from 100 GeV/$c^2$ - 150 GeV/$c^2$. Using the corrected $b$-jet energies instead of the standard calorimeter-based $b$-jet energies results in a $\sim$ 9% improvement in the expected sensitivity for Higgs boson production cross section in the most sensitive search region of the $WH \rightarrow \ell νb\bar b$ analysis, which is two tagged jets and one charged central lepton.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.