Paper detail

Improved and Efficient Conversational Slot Labeling through Question Answering

Transformer-based pretrained language models (PLMs) offer unmatched performance across the majority of natural language understanding (NLU) tasks, including a body of question answering (QA) tasks. We hypothesize that improvements in QA methodology can also be directly exploited in dialog NLU; however, dialog tasks must be \textit{reformatted} into QA tasks. In particular, we focus on modeling and studying \textit{slot labeling} (SL), a crucial component of NLU for dialog, through the QA optics, aiming to improve both its performance and efficiency, and make it more effective and resilient to working with limited task data. To this end, we make a series of contributions: 1) We demonstrate how QA-tuned PLMs can be applied to the SL task, reaching new state-of-the-art performance, with large gains especially pronounced in such low-data regimes. 2) We propose to leverage contextual information, required to tackle ambiguous values, simply through natural language. 3) Efficiency and compactness of QA-oriented fine-tuning are boosted through the use of lightweight yet effective adapter modules. 4) Trading-off some of the quality of QA datasets for their size, we experiment with larger automatically generated QA datasets for QA-tuning, arriving at even higher performance. Finally, our analysis suggests that our novel QA-based slot labeling models, supported by the PLMs, reach a performance ceiling in high-data regimes, calling for more challenging and more nuanced benchmarks in future work.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.