Paper detail

Improved Algorithmic Bounds for Discrepancy of Sparse Set Systems

We consider the problem of finding a low discrepancy coloring for sparse set systems where each element lies in at most $t$ sets. We give an algorithm that finds a coloring with discrepancy $O((t \log n \log s)^{1/2})$ where $s$ is the maximum cardinality of a set. This improves upon the previous constructive bound of $O(t^{1/2} \log n)$ based on algorithmic variants of the partial coloring method, and for small $s$ (e.g.$s=\textrm{poly}(t)$) comes close to the non-constructive $O((t \log n)^{1/2})$ bound due to Banaszczyk. Previously, no algorithmic results better than $O(t^{1/2}\log n)$ were known even for $s = O(t^2)$. Our method is quite robust and we give several refinements and extensions. For example, the coloring we obtain satisfies the stronger size-sensitive property that each set $S$ in the set system incurs an $O((t \log n \log |S|)^{1/2})$ discrepancy. Another variant can be used to essentially match Banaszczyk's bound for a wide class of instances even where $s$ is arbitrarily large. Finally, these results also extend directly to the more general Komlós setting.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.