Paper detail

Improved Algorithm for Permutation Testing

For a permutation $π: [K]\rightarrow [K]$, a sequence $f: \{1,2,\cdots, n\}\rightarrow \mathbb R$ contains a $π$-pattern of size $K$, if there is a sequence of indices $(i_1, i_2, \cdots, i_K)$ ($i_1<i_2<\cdots<i_K$), satisfying that $f(i_a)<f(i_b)$ if $π(a)<π(b)$, for $a,b\in [K]$. Otherwise, $f$ is referred to as $π$-free. For the special case where $π= (1,2,\cdots, K)$, it is referred to as the monotone pattern. \cite{newman2017testing} initiated the study of testing $π$-freeness with one-sided error. They focused on two specific problems, testing the monotone permutations and the $(1,3,2)$ permutation. For the problem of testing monotone permutation $(1,2,\cdots,K)$, \cite{ben2019finding} improved the $(\log n)^{O(K^2)}$ non-adaptive query complexity of \cite{newman2017testing} to $O((\log n)^{\lfloor \log_{2} K\rfloor})$. Further, \cite{ben2019optimal} proposed an adaptive algorithm with $O(\log n)$ query complexity. However, no progress has yet been made on the problem of testing $(1,3,2)$-freeness. In this work, we present an adaptive algorithm for testing $(1,3,2)$-freeness. The query complexity of our algorithm is $O(ε^{-2}\log^4 n)$, which significantly improves over the $O(ε^{-7}\log^{26}n)$-query adaptive algorithm of \cite{newman2017testing}. This improvement is mainly achieved by the proposal of a new structure embedded in the patterns.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.