Paper detail

Imprints of Gravitational Millilensing on the Light Curve of GRBs

In this work, we search for signatures of gravitational millilensing in Gamma-ray bursts (GRB) in which the source-lens-observer geometry produces two images that manifest in the GRB light curve as superimposed peaks with identical temporal variability (or echoes), separated by the time delay between the two images. According to the sensitivity of our detection method, we consider millilensing events due to point mass lenses in the range of $10^5 - 10^7 M_{\odot}$ at lens redshift about half that of the GRB, with a time delay in the order of $10$ seconds. Current GRB observatories are capable of resolving and constraining this lensing scenario if the above conditions are met. We investigated the Fermi/GBM GRB archive from the year 2008 to 2020 using the autocorrelation technique and we found one millilensed GRB candidate out of 2137 GRBs searched, which we use to estimate the optical depth of millilensed GRBs by performing a Monte-Carlo simulation to find the efficiency of our detection method. Considering a point-mass model for the gravitational lens, where the lens is a supermassive black hole, we show that the density parameter of black holes ($Ω_{BH}$) with mass $\approx10^6 M_\odot$ is about $0.007 \pm 0.004$. Our result is one order of magnitude larger compared to consist with previous work in a lower mass range ($10^2 - 10^3 M_{\odot}$), which gave a density parameter $Ω_{BH} \approx 5\times 10^{-4}$, and recent work in the mass range of $10^2 - 10^7 M_{\odot}$ that reported $Ω_{BH} \approx 4.6\times 10^{-4}$. The mass fraction of black holes in this mass range to the total mass of the universe would be $f\approx Ω_{BH}/Ω_M=0.027 \pm 0.016$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.