Paper detail

Imprints of feedback in young gasless clusters?

We present the results of N-body simulations in which we take the masses, positions and velocities of sink particles from five pairs of hydrodynamical simulations of star formation by Dale et al. (2012, 2013) and evolve them for a further 10Myr. We compare the dynamical evolution of star clusters that formed under the influence of mass-loss driven by photoionization feedback, to the evolution of clusters that formed without feedback. We remove any remaining gas and follow the evolution of structure in the clusters (measured by the Q-parameter), half-mass radius, central density, surface density and the fraction of bound stars. There is little discernible difference in the evolution of clusters that formed with feedback compared to those that formed without. The only clear trend is that all clusters which form without feedback in the hydrodynamical simulations lose any initial structure over 10Myr, whereas some of the clusters which form with feedback retain structure for the duration of the subsequent N-body simulation. This is due to lower initial densities (and hence longer relaxation times) in the clusters from Dale et al. (2012, 2013) which formed with feedback, which prevents dynamical mixing from erasing substructure. However, several other conditions (such as supervirial initial velocities) also preserve substructure, so at a given epoch one would require knowledge of the initial density and virial state of the cluster in order to determine whether star formation in a cluster has been strongly influenced by feedback.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.