Paper detail

Impossible Triangle: What's Next for Pre-trained Language Models?

Recent development of large-scale pre-trained language models (PLM) have significantly improved the capability of models in various NLP tasks, in terms of performance after task-specific fine-tuning and zero-shot / few-shot learning. However, many of such models come with a dauntingly huge size that few institutions can afford to pre-train, fine-tune or even deploy, while moderate-sized models usually lack strong generalized few-shot learning capabilities. In this paper, we first elaborate the current obstacles of using PLM models in terms of the Impossible Triangle: 1) moderate model size, 2) state-of-the-art few-shot learning capability, and 3) state-of-the-art fine-tuning capability. We argue that all existing PLM models lack one or more properties from the Impossible Triangle. To remedy these missing properties of PLMs, various techniques have been proposed, such as knowledge distillation, data augmentation and prompt learning, which inevitably brings additional work to the application of PLMs in real scenarios. We then offer insights into future research directions of PLMs to achieve the Impossible Triangle, and break down the task into several key phases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.