Paper detail

Impossible? Publication Quality Research with the Weakest 10% of Incoming Freshmen

Undergraduate research is widely regarded as a high impact practice. However, usually only the highest achieving students are rewarded with undergraduate research opportunities. This paper reports on the successful implementation of a student research program offering the weakest 10% of incoming freshmen opportunities to conduct original research in one of several science or engineering disciplines with the possibility of publication if the research and report meet a suitable standard, defined as earning an A on the final research project report in the introductory math course. The opportunity has been offered now for two years to incoming cadets at the United States Air Force Academy who are placed in Basic Math. The cadets placed in this course score in the bottom 5% of incoming cadets on the math placement exam. During the second semester of their freshman year, cadets enrolled in Calculus 1 are also offered a similar research opportunity. About 10% of cadets are enrolled in this course each Spring, the 5% who began in Basic Math and matriculate to Calculus 1 and the 5% who failed Calculus 1 in their first attempt. During the first four semesters, the program has yielded 22 cadet papers which have been published or are currently under review and expected to be published. This represents approximately 38% of the projects in the program, because the majority of the projects do not earn As and are not suitable for publication. Over 80% of the cadet co-authors on the publication quality papers are minorities, women, and/or intercollegiate athletes.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.