Paper detail

Importance of source structure on complex organics emission. I. Observations of CH$_3$OH from low-mass to high-mass protostars

Complex organic molecules (COMs) are often observed toward embedded Class 0 and I protostars. However, not all Class 0 and I protostars exhibit COMs emission. In this work, variations in methanol (CH$_3$OH) emission are studied to test if absence of CH$_3$OH emission can be linked to source properties. Combining both new and archival observations with ALMA and sources from the literature, a sample of 184 low-mass and high-mass protostars is investigated. The warm (T > 100 K) gaseous CH$_3$OH mass, $M_{\rm CH_3OH}$, is determined for each source using primarily optically thin isotopologues. On average, Class I protostellar systems seem to have less warm $M_{\rm CH_3OH}$ ($<10^{-10}$ M$_\odot$) than younger Class 0 sources ($\sim10^{-7}$ M$_\odot$). High-mass sources in our sample show higher warm $M_{\rm CH_3OH}$ up to $10^{-7}-10^{-3}$ M$_\odot$. To take into account the effect of the source's overall mass on $M_{\rm CH_3OH}$, a normalized CH$_3$OH mass is defined as $M_{\rm CH_3OH}/M_{\rm dust,0}$, where $M_{\rm dust,0}$ is the cold + warm dust mass within a fixed radius. Excluding upper limits, a simple power-law fit to the normalized warm CH$_3$OH masses results in $M_{\rm CH_3OH}/M_{\rm dust,0}\propto L_{\rm bol}^{0.70\pm0.05}$. This is in good agreement with a simple hot core toy model which predicts that the normalized $M_{\rm CH_3OH}$ increases with $L_{\rm bol}^{0.75}$ due to the snowline moving outward. Sources for which the size of the disk is equivalent or smaller than the estimated 100 K radius agree well with the best-fit power-law model, whereas sources with significantly larger disks show up to two orders of magnitude lower normalized warm CH$_3$OH masses. Based on the latter results, we suggest that source structure such as a disk can result in colder gas and thus fewer COMs in the gas phase. Additionally, optically thick dust can hide the emission of COMs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.