Paper detail

Importance of Linking Inertia and Frequency Response Procurement: The Great Britain Case

In order to decarbonise the electricity sector, the future Great Britain (GB) power system will be largely dominated by non-synchronous renewables. This will cause low levels of inertia, a key parameter that could lead to frequency deterioration. Therefore, the requirement for ancillary services that contain frequency deviations will increase significantly, particularly given the increase in size of the largest possible loss with the commissioning of large nuclear plants in the near future. In this paper, an inertia-dependent Stochastic Unit Commitment (SUC) model is used to illustrate the benefits of linking inertia and frequency response provision in low-inertia systems. We demonstrate that the cost of procuring ancillary services in GB could increase by 165% if the level of inertia is not explicitly considered when procuring frequency response. These results highlight the need to re-think the structure of ancillary-services markets, which in GB are nowadays held one month ahead of delivery.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.