Paper detail

Implications of the Super-K atmospheric data for the mixing angles $θ_{13}$ and $θ_{23}$

A three-neutrino analysis of oscillation data is performed using the recent, more finely binned Super-K oscillation data, together with the CHOOZ, K2K, and MINOS data. The solar parameters, $Δ_{21}$ and $θ_{12}$, are fixed from a recent analysis, and $Δ_{32}$, $θ_{13}$, and $θ_{23}$ are varied. We utilize the full three-neutrino oscillation probability and an exact treatment of the Earth's MSW effect with a castle-wall density. By including terms linear in $θ_{13}$ and $\varepsilon := θ_{23} - π/4$, we find asymmetric errors for these parameters $θ_{13}=-0.07^{+0.18}_{-0.11}$ and $\varepsilon=0.03^{+0.09}_{-0.15}$. For $θ_{13}$, we see that the lower bound is primarily set by the CHOOZ experiment while the upper bound is determined by the low energy $e$-like events in the Super-K atmospheric data. We find that the parameters $θ_{13}$ and $\varepsilon$ are correlated -- the preferred negative value of $θ_{13}$ permits the preferred value of $θ_{23}$ to be in the second octant, and the true value of $θ_{13}$ affects the allowed region for $θ_{23}$.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.