Paper detail

Implications of the Non-Observation of ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$ in Halo Stars for the Primordial ${}^{7}{\rm Li}$ Problem

The primordial Lithium Problem is intimately connected to the assumption that ${}^{7}{\rm Li}$ observed in metal-poor halo stars retains its primordial abundance, which lies significantly below the predictions of standard big-bang nucleosynthesis. Two key lines of evidence have argued that these stars have not significantly depleted their initial ${}^{7}{\rm Li}$: i) the lack of dispersion in Li abundances measured at low metallicity; and ii) the detection of the more fragile ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$ isotope in at least two halo stars. The purported ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$ detections were in good agreement with predictions from cosmic-ray nucleosynthesis which is responsible for the origin of ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$. This concordance left little room for depletion of ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$ depletion, and implied that the more robust ${}^{7}{\rm Li}$ largely evaded destruction. Recent (re)-observations of halo stars challenge the evidence against ${}^{7}{\rm Li}$ depletion: i) lithium abundances now show significant dispersion, and ii) sensitive ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$ searches now reveal only firm upper limits to the ${}^{6}{\rm Li}/{}^{7}{\rm Li}$ ratio. The tight new ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$ upper limits generally fall far below the predictions of cosmic-ray nucleosynthesis, implying that substantial ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$ depletion has occurred--by factors up to 50. We show that in stars with ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$ limits and thus lower bounds on ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$ depletion, an equal amount of ${}^{7}{\rm Li}$ depletion is more than sufficient to resolve the primordial ${}^{7}{\rm Li}$ Problem. This picture is consistent with stellar models in which ${}^{7}{\rm Li}$ is less depleted than ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$, and strengthen the case that the Lithium Problem has an astrophysical solution. We conclude by suggesting future observations that could test these ideas. (abridged)

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.