Paper detail

Implications Of The Higgs Discovery On Physics Beyond The Standard Model

In this thesis, we investigate the implications of the LHC Higgs data on different BSM scenarios. Since the data seem to agree with the SM expectations, any nonstandard couplings will be strongly constrained. First we investigate, in a model independent way, the constraints on the nonstandard Higgs couplings with the fermions and the vector bosons in view of high energy unitarity and the measured value of the Higgs to diphoton signal strength. Then we concentrate on a particular BSM scenario, namely, the two Higgs-doublet models (2HDMs). Consistency of the Higgs data with the corresponding SM predictions strongly motivates us to work in the {\em alignment limit}. In this limit, including the informations of Higgs mass and its SM-like nature, we find many new constraints on the nonstandard masses and $\tanβ$. We also study the constraints on the charged scalar mass arising from the $h\to γγ$ signal strength measurements and observe that the charged scalar does not necessarily decouple from the diphoton decay width. We then move on to some particular variants of 2HDMs, known as BGL models, and study the flavor constraints on these models. Here we find that lighter than conventionally allowed nonstandard scalars can successfully negotiate the stringent bounds coming from flavor physics data and can leave unconventional decay signatures that can be used as distinctive features of these models. We also analyze the stability and unitarity constraints in a three Higgs-doublet model (3HDM) with $S_3$ symmetry and find that there must be many more nonstandard particles below 1~TeV. We also observe that the nondecoupling feature of the charged scalar in the context of $h\to γγ$ is not unique to the 2HDMs only, instead it is a general property of the multi doublet extensions of the SM with an exact discrete symmetry.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.