Paper detail

Implications of the discovery of a Higgs boson with a mass of 125 GeV

The rather precise knowledge of the mass of the Higgs boson and of its couplings has important consequences for the physical phenomena taking place at the Fermi scale. We analyze some of these implications in the most motivated frameworks for physics at that energies - supersymmetry, models of a composite Higgs boson, and the Standard Model itself. At the same time, precision experiments in flavour physics require a highly non-generic structure of flavour and CP transitions. In any model of electroweak symmetry breaking with a relatively low scale of new phenomena, as motivated by naturalness, some mechanism has to be found in order to keep unwanted flavour effects under control. We devote particular attention to the consequences of the approximate U(2)^3 symmetry exhibited by the quarks of the Standard Model. The combined analysis of the indirect constraints from flavour, Higgs and electroweak physics will allow us to outline a picture of some most natural models of physics near the Fermi scale. Although non trivially, a few models emerge that look capable of accommodating a 125 GeV Higgs boson, consistently with all the other constraints, with new particles in an interesting range for discovery at the LHC, as well as associated flavour signals. This is particularly interesting in view of the forthcoming improvements in the direct experimental investigation of that energies. Finally, the measurement of the last parameter of the Standard Model - the Higgs quartic coupling - has important consequences even if no new physics is present close to the Fermi scale: its near-critical value, which puts the electroweak vacuum in a metastable state close to a phase transition, may have an interesting connection with Planck-scale physics. We derive the bound for electroweak vacuum stability with full two-loop precision, and explore some possible implication of near-criticality.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.