Paper detail

Implications of nonzero $θ_{13}$ for the neutrino mass hierarchy

The Daya Bay, RENO, and Double Chooz experiments have discovered a large non-zero value for $θ_{13}$. We present a global analysis that includes these three experiments, Chooz, the Super-K atmospheric data, and the $ν_μ\rightarrow ν_e$ T2K and MINOS experiments that are sensitive to the hierarchy and the sign of $θ_{13}$. We report preliminary results in which we fix the mixing parameters other than $θ_{13}$ to those from a recent global analysis. Given there is no evidence for a non-zero CP violation, we assume $δ=0$. T2K and MINOS lie in a region of $L/E$ where there is a hierarchy degeneracy in the limit of $θ_{13}\rightarrow 0$ and no matter interaction. For non-zero $θ_{13}$, the symmetry is partially broken, but a degeneracy under the simultaneous exchange of both hierarchy and the sign of $θ_{13}$ remains. Matter effects break this symmetry such that the positions of the peaks in the oscillation probabilities maintain the two-fold symmetry, while the magnitude of the oscillations is sensitive to the hierarchy. This renders T2K and NO$ν$A, with different baselines and different matter effects, better able in combination to distinguish the hierarchy and the sign of $θ_{13}$. The large value of $θ_{13}$ yields effects from atmospheric data that distinguish hierarchies. We find for normal hierarchy, positive $θ_{13}$, $\sin^22θ_{13}=0.090\pm0.020$ and is 0.2% probable it is the correct combination; for normal hierarchy, negative $θ_{13}$, $\sin^22θ_{13}=0.108\pm0.023$ and is 2.2% probable; for inverse hierarchy, positive $θ_{13}$, $\sin^22θ_{13}=0.110\pm0.022$ and is 7.1% probable; for inverse hierarchy, negative $θ_{13}$, $\sin^22θ_{13}=0.113\pm0.022$ and is 90.5% probable, results that are inconsistent with two similar analyses.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.