Paper detail

Implications of Lorentz violation on Higgs-mediated lepton flavor violation

The lepton flavor violating decay of the Higgs boson $H\to l_Al_B$ is studied within two qualitatively different extensions of the Yukawa sector: one renormalizable and the other nonrenormalizable; both incorporating Lorentz violation in a model-independent fashion. These extensions are characterized by Yukawa-like matrices, the former by a constant Lorentz 2-tensor $Y^{AB}_{μν}$, whereas the latter by a constant Lorentz vector $Y^{AB}_μ$. It is found that the experimental constraints on the decays $l_A\to l_Bγ$ severely restrict lepton flavor violating Higgs signals in the renormalizable scenario. In this context, it is found that $BR(H\to μ^\pm e^\mp)$ and $BR(H\to τ^\pm μ^\mp)$ cannot be larger than $10^{-18}$ and $10^{-11}$, respectively. In the nonrenormalizable scenario, transitions mediated by the Higgs or the $Z$ gauge boson are induced at tree level, and we find mild restrictions on lepton flavor violation. Using the experimental limits on the three-body decays $l_A \to l_B \bar{l}_Cl_C$ to constraint the vector $Y^{AB}_μ$, it is found that the branching ratio for the decays $H\to μ^\pm e^\mp$ is of about $4\times 10^{-9}$, more important, a branching ratio of $7\times 10^{-4}$ is found for the $τ^\pm μ^\mp$ mode. Accordingly, the decay $H \to τ^\pm μ^\mp$ could be at the reach of future measurements. The lepton flavor violating decays of the $Z$ gauge boson were also studied. In the renormalizable scenario, it was found the undetectable branching ratios $BR(Z\to μ^\pm e^\mp)<5.7\times 10^{-21}$ and $BR(Z\to τ^\pm μ^\mp)<2.0\times 10^{-12}$. In the nonrenormalizable scenario, it was found that $BR(Z\to μ^\pm e^\mp)<0.67\times 10^{-12}$ and $BR(Z\to τ^\pm μ^\mp)<1.12\times 10^{-7}$. Although the latter branching ratio is relatively large, it still could not be within the range of future measurements.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.