Paper detail

Implications of GRB 130603B and its macronova for r-process nucleosynthesis

The tentative identification of a Li-Paczynski macronova following the short GRB 130603B indicated that a few hundredths of a solar mass of neutron star matter were ejected and that this ejected mass has radioactively decayed into heavy r-process elements. If correct, this confirms long standing predictions (Eichler, Livio, Piran and Schramm 1989) that on the one hand, sGRBs are produced in compact binary mergers (CBMs) and on the other hand that these events are significant and possibly dominant sources of the heavy (A>130) r-process nuclei. Assuming that this interpretation is correct we obtain a lower limit of 0.02 m_sun on the ejected mass. Using the current estimates of the rate of sGRBs and with a beaming factor of 50, mergers associated with sGRBs can produce all the observed heavy r-process material in the Universe. We confront this conclusion with cosmochemistry and show that even though such events are rare, mixing is sufficient to account for the current homogeneous distribution of r-process material in the Galaxy. However, the appearance of significant amounts of Eu in some very low metallicity stars requires that some mergers took place very early on, namely with a very short time delay after the earliest star formation episodes. Alternatively, an additional early r-processsource may have contributed at that early stage. Finally, we note that evidence for short lived {244}^Pu in the very early solar system suggests that a merger of this kind took place within the vicinity of the solar system shortly (a few hundred million years) before its formation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.