Paper detail

Implications of $δ_{CP}=-90^\circ$ towards determining hierarchy and octant at T2K and T2K-II

The T2K experiment has provided the first hint for the best-fit value for the leptonic CP phase $δ_{CP} \sim -90^\circ$ from neutrino data. This is now corroborated by the NO$ν$A neutrino runs. We study the implications for neutrino mass hierarchy and octant of $θ_{23}$ in the context of this data assuming that the true value of $δ_{CP}$ in nature is $-90^\circ$. Based on simple arguments on degeneracies in the probabilities we show that a clear signal of $δ_{CP}=-90^\circ$ coming from T2K neutrino (antineutrino) data is only possible if the true hierarchy is normal and the true octant is higher (lower). Thus if the T2K neutrino and antineutrino data are fitted separately and both give the true value of $δ_{CP}=-90^\circ$, this will imply that nature has chosen the true hierarchy to be normal and $θ_{23} \approx 45^\circ$. However we find that the combined fit of neutrino and antineutrino data will still point to true hierarchy as normal but the octant of $θ_{23}$ will remain undetermined. We do our analysis for both, the current projected exposure ($7.8 \times 10^{21}$ pot) and planned extended exposure ($20 \times 10^{21}$ pot). We also present the CP discovery potential of T2K emphasizing on the role of antineutrinos. We find that one of the main contribution of the antineutrino data is to remove the degenerate solutions with the wrong octant. Thus the antineutrino run plays a more significant role for those hierarchy-octant combinations for which this degeneracy is present. If this degeneracy is absent, then only neutrino run gives a better result for fixed $θ_{13}$. However if we marginalize over $θ_{13}$ then, sensitivity corresponding to mixed run can be better than pure neutrino run.

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.